On Oct 9, 2007, at 13:42, Henri Sivonen wrote: > I have taken "inline-level content" to mean "structured inline- > level content" when it appears as a content model, but I think it > would be better for the spec to explicitly say "structured inline- > level content" in content models. Except in the case of the content model of <address>, it seems. <address> should take strictly inline-level content only for backwards compat reasons, right? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 09:55:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:04 GMT