Re: Editorial: Content model for <head>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:19 GMT

I think that supplementing prose with a schema fragment with content  
model (or an example) might aid in understanding, but replacing it  
with any of them will only lead to confusion. I can think of ways in  
which a schema fragment or example might hurt though -- if content  
models and examples aren't used to clarify other points, they may  
lead a reader to believe that there is something unique or different  
about the description for head.

The text below seems to be very clear.

>>     Zero or one meta element(s) with a charset attribute,
>>     followed by zero or one base element(s),
>>     followed, in any order, by one title element
>>     and zero or more other metadata elements such
>>     as link, meta, style, and script.
>
> Don't you think that having small schema fragment with content model
> here will be more readable and easier to understand?
>