W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:45:32 +0100
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t2kux6sf64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:38:22 +0100, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>  
> On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section- 
>> conformance.html#conformance covers those implementations already.
> Only if you think it is reasonable for such an implementor to filter
> through the irrelevant content and reverse engineer a data definition
> from the normative DOM description.  I don't.

Have you tried? I created a parsing tool that can be used (and is used on  
a small scale) for data mining, validation, checking implementations, etc.  
that does not support scripting and our team did not have much problems  
with the specification. In fact, it was quite a straightforward process  
and where it was not we provided feedback to improve the specification.  
Others have done similar things.

http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/ is that project by the way.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 23:52:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:28 UTC