Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element?

On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:

>
> Dan, I think Maciej's point is that the survey doesn't distinguish  
> between:
> "I want canvas in HTML5, and I believe it's already covered by the  
> charter"
> "I want canvas in HTML5, but we need to recharter to cover it"
> "I don't want canvas in HTML5 (we should charter a different WG to  
> do it)"
> "I don't want canvas in HTML5 (go away)"
>
> The latest survey still doesn't (particularly, the difference  
> between the first two is significant).
>
> Maciej, does that echo your concern?

Yes, it does. I think the separate surveys have addressed my concern.

Regards,
Maciej

>
>
> -Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-wg-announce-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-wg-announce-request@w3.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 2:03 PM
> To: public-html@w3.org
> Cc: public-html-wg-announce
> Subject: Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics  
> a la canvas element?
>
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:20 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
>> Please answer right away!
>> You may update your response over the course of the week.
>> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/req-gapi-canvas/
>
> Several people said that including the possible charter
> impact in this question was unhelpful; I'm persuaded,
> so I moved it to a separate tactics survey, which also
> discusses a possible supplementary tutorial document,
> a task force, etc...
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/tactics-gapi-canvas/
>
> I may continue to tweak them today, so if the exact wording
> matters to you, check again later in the week.
>
> Perhaps it's best to consider all surveys subject to
> change on the first day...
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 00:04:52 UTC