Mark Baker wrote: > That sounds like "safe". "idempotent", for a message, means that any > series of identical messages means the same as just one. OK. Let's start here, since we seem to have some agreement on this. Can we agree that for ping a series of identical messages is NOT in fact the same as just one? And that therefore ping is not idempotent? -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 05:12:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 February 2008 16:12:19 GMT