- From: Shawn Medero <soypunk@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 20:19:44 -0400
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "HTML Issue Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 11/2/07, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > Question: Is there a way to distinguish issues that are in the following > states?: > > * Newly added > * Written in the format described in the template and e-mails above > * Read, considered, and handled by the editors > * Closed According to the current Tracker feature set, _no_: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/features "Very simple schema. Actions have a title and a due date and are assigned to a single Working Group member. Issues have a title, a description and are related to a product. Issues can only have two states (OPEN and CLOSED)." Though the planned features suggest it is on the way: "More states for issues - allow issues and actions to be in more states than simply OPEN and CLOSED. (Note that I'm hesitant to do this because the CDF group have had a lot of success with only the binary states)." I'll ping the Systeam and see what the status of this feature is. I sorta like the minimalism+immediacy of OPEN vs. CLOSED but I do wish there was a way that arbitrary keywords could be applied to an issue. -s
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2007 00:19:58 UTC