- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 07:19:04 -0400
- To: Bruce Boughton <bruce@bruceboughton.me.uk>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Bruce Boughton wrote: > Dmitry Turin wrote: >> This demand is anachronism, >> first, since _behaviour, binding, pronouncing_ are already specified in it; >> second, since sense has appeared to abolish it. > > Could you give examples to support your assertion that behaviour and > binding are described by CSS? Only example I can think of is the BeCSS[1], which was introduced for languages like XBL 2.0 and Microsoft's HTML Controls (HTCs). > Pronounciation is surely a presentational > matter, just as applying bold, italics or colour is. In theory, pronunciation and inflection can provide semantic information. However, such semantics are so fine grained and open to interpretation that I doubt it would be any more useful that simply providing aural styling. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-becss-20070205/
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 11:19:24 UTC