W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Common pool of examples and validation

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:43:11 +0900
Message-Id: <C5AFA485-7CCD-4716-8059-C2A0901DDAA5@w3.org>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>


Le 31 mai 2007 à 15:41, Henri Sivonen a écrit :

> On May 31, 2007, at 08:42, Karl Dubost wrote:
>
>> * a unique identifier (URI should be fine)
>> * a short title
>> * purpose of the test
>> * a description
>> * reference to the specification
>> * expected results
>
> For all kinds of HTML5 test cases, it would be very useful to have  
> a machine-readable annotation of whether the document is supposed  
> to be conforming even if the test case has been written for another  
> purpose such as browser testing. (This could be considered to be  
> part of "expected results" but for test written for other purposes  
> it may not automatically be.)

What format do you propose? Please, give an example of code.

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 06:43:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:59 GMT