W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:52:19 +0100
Message-ID: <465DABC3.3020301@splintered.co.uk>
To: public-html@w3.org
CC: wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org

Thomas Broyer wrote:

> The point is that, as actually designed, HTML5 define *one* way of
> processing HTML that is compatible with what browsers do today.

...

 > HTML5, by design, tries to reduce browsers incompatibilities by
 > standardizing their current behaviors. The goal is not to have "yet
 > another standards mode".

In that case, I wonder: why do we actually have the "headers attribute 
in tables" debate? Current screen readers (assuming that you generally 
meant "user agents" when saying "browsers") support them and use them. 
Not including them in the spec would result in breakage - unless we're 
hoping that any heuristics that were defined to compensate for the 
removal of headers will still be able to silently extract the same 
information from the table while ignoring the headers themselves and 
treating them as invalid code?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:52:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:59 GMT