- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 18:44:22 +0200
- To: Brad Fults <bfults@neatbox.com>
- Cc: Bruce Boughton <bruce@bruceboughton.me.uk>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, "Preston L.Bannister" <preston@bannister.us>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Brad Fults wrote: > I strongly advise all participants of this group to attempt to read > and understand proposals and discussions thoroughly before replying > with inflammatory remarks that polarize the group around non-existent > problems and distinctions. I think I started to work on scoped stylesheets, have explored how this helps or annoys wysiwyg copy/paste let's say fifteen years before the start of this thread. I also perfectly know that making such a decision _now_ may totally block online applications in the future if we don't give all our thoughts here right now. I can't count the number of ftf meetings I saw where we completely reoriented something because someone "thinking at loud" made a good point w/o even noticing it. And you're the only one here to see "inflammatory" remarks. Hyatt and I know each other too well to exchange flames w/o drinking a few beers together first... I also perfectly understood Dave's original point. I disagree with it entirely, can I ? </Daniel>
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2007 16:44:26 UTC