Re: 'role' should be property

Mark Birbeck wrote:
> The proposal you link to is very odd. :) The authors use @role in
> other situations, such as XHTML, but for some reason not in HTML. I
> think it might be caused by a problem with the W3C validator, which I
> believe was incorrectly flagging documents with extra attributes as
> being invalid (HTML says that extra attributes should just be
> ignored). This probably led them to try to find another solution, but
> ...

Does it really say that? Pointer?

Best regards, Julian