- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:02:30 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
Mark Birbeck wrote:> > [T]here is also no reason that some non-presentational > properties [of CSS] couldn't be defined. Isn't the reason simply that CSS = CSS = "Cascading Style Sheets", a medium through which to express /style/ (which is inherently presentational) ? You could posit (say) CWS (Cascading whatever sheets) that have the same syntax as CSS but which allow aspects other than style to be defined, but by conflating dissimilar ideas you would weaken both ... Philip Taylor
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:02:09 UTC