Laura Carlson wrote: > The proposed HTML 5 design principle "Pave The Cowpaths" [4] does > indeed seem to condone many practices that past specs may have > frowned upon. "Pave the Cowpaths" is an underlying principle being > debated in many* of the recent semantics and accessibility threads on > public-html@w3.org. Is it possible that the two sides are talking past each other a little bit? I can see two possible formulations of "Pave the Cowpaths": 1) Find a thing lots of people are trying to do, and the markup hacks/proprietary features/workarounds they are using to do it, and put those hacks into the spec. 2) Find a thing lots of people are trying to do, and make sure the new spec provides a simple way to do it, which may or may not be related markup-wise to the way they are doing it now. I think perhaps that many Pave The Cowpath proponents are arguing for 2), but many of their opponents are afraid of and arguing against 1). Could that be so? I would certainly argue for 2), but be against 1), as _principles_. GervReceived on Monday, 14 May 2007 14:53:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:58 GMT