W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 12:08:50 -0700
Message-ID: <463F7942.10401@sicking.cc>
To: John Foliot <foliot@wats.ca>
Cc: 'Nicholas Chase' <nchase@earthlink.net>, 'Dan Connolly' <connolly@w3.org>, 'Anne van Kesteren' <annevk@opera.com>, www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org

> If all you want to do is maintain the status quo (your term was "current
> practices"), then what exactly is the point of the exercise?  The
> accessibility advocates in this discussion are trying to create "the highest
> value possible" too, or does that not count?

The point is to give web authors a more powerful language to create more 
powerful web pages in. WA1 has lots of useful features for web authors.

/ Jonas
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 19:09:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:58 GMT