W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms

From: Weston Ruter <westonruter@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:59:07 -0700
Message-ID: <fb8299e10705040059p15a04fc3u5b1203f4e8908f0@mail.gmail.com>
To: "David Hyatt" <hyatt@apple.com>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, public-forms@w3.org, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
I've have been putting together a test suite for the current WF2 repetition
model specification to demonstrate its capabilities and to test a
cross-browser implementation. The suite may be helpful for this working
group to get a better idea of the use cases for the WF2 repetition model and
to see how it is designed.

http://weston.ruter.net/projects/repetition-model/testsuite/

Weston

On 5/3/07, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote:
>
>
> On May 3, 2007, at 7:35 PM, Weston Ruter wrote:
>
> >
> > The WF2 repetition model is not bound to forms, even though it
> > appears with in the "Web Forms" specification. Templates may be
> > made of any elements by adding the relevant attribute
> > (repeat="template") and so the WF2 repetition templates work
> > "outside of a form." In order to declaratively make use of the
> > repetition model's functionality, however, one must use the new WF2
> > repetition model form buttons. Perhaps this is what you are
> > referring to.
>
> Ah, ok.  I assumed because this model appeared in a spec devoted to
> forms that it would require an enclosing form in order to work.  If
> it does not, then why isn't the entire section in Web Apps 1.0
> instead of WF2?
>
> dave
> (hyatt@apple.com)
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 18:52:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:58 GMT