W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Cleaning House

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 12:11:15 +0100
Message-ID: <20070504121115.x0yvuuayo65oo4g0@www.splintered.co.uk>
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Cc: public-html@w3.org, www-html@w3.org

Quoting Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>:

> Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>> Quoting Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>:
>>> Note that the current WHATWG HTML5 proposal defines <strong> as
>>> denoting importance and <em> as denoting emphasis. For "strong
>>> emphasis" you would use nested <em> elements.
>>
>> The difference being...what exactly?
>
> Read the spec.
>
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-strong
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-em

I assume you refer to

"Changing the importance of a piece of text with the strong element  
does not change the meaning of the sentence."

and

"The placement of emphasis changes the meaning of the sentence."

Which is a distinction that, despite the copious examples for <em>,  
feels artificial...

Ho hum,

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 11:14:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:58 GMT