Elliott Sprehn wrote: > Is there a problem with accepting the WHATWG HTML5 specification as a > starting point? A lot of this work was already done. I believe that there /is/ a problem, and the problem lies in your last line. A lot of the work /had already/ been done in HTML 4.01 Strict; the WHATWG HTML5 specification appears to ignore much of that, and to base its design on less rigorous specifications (HTML 4.01 Transitional, possibly even HTML 3.2 : I haven't yet had time to check the provenance of all legacy elements included). Philip TaylorReceived on Thursday, 3 May 2007 11:09:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:58 GMT