W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)

From: Maurice <maurice@thymeonline.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:14:30 -0400
To: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C25E4D46.248C%maurice@thymeonline.com>

On 5/2/07 2:59 AM, "Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis" <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Adrian Sutton wrote:
> 
>> That said, by default our editor outputs the span tag version because we
>> like to follow standards and I recommend using our styles menu to apply CSS
>> classes and appropriate structural markup (headings etc). We did however
>> have to go back and add an option to output font tags because of user
>> complaints.
> 
> Why did these user complaints arise? How did the end-users tell the
> difference between the span and font elements?
> 
> --
> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis


Yes, I'd also like to know why the complaints arose.
I can't understand why people would nag you for a font menu on a web app
when the web really only has a handful of fonts that can be used and they
don't look that different from each other.

Couldn't you have just asked them what font they wanted, along with what
size and color and give them additional style options?

-- 
::   thyme online ltd
::   po box cb13650  nassau  the bahamas
::   website: http://www.thymeonline.com/
::   tel: 242 327-1864  fax: 242 377 1038
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 18:18:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:58 GMT