- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 20:11:12 +0200
- To: "Dave Raggett" <dsr@w3.org>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Cc: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, dbaron@dbaron.org, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, 01 May 2007 20:06:31 +0200, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > I think that we may differ on how effective CSS's error handling > really is. It's great that there is a well defined way to resume > parsing after finding something that isn't understood or which > violates the grammar in someway, but CSS hasn't helped developers > who are struggling to deal with browsers that vary considerably in > their support for CSS. You have to learn all kinds of subtle rules > of thumb which is a great shame for something that should be really > simple. > > In fact, one could say that the problems with CSS and scripting > dwarf any interoperability problems with HTML itself. However, the > idea of converging on the parsing algorithm for HTML is certainly > attractive. Your arguments are applicable to implementations of CSS, not CSS itself. Maybe also a little to the CSS community for not creating enough testcases. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 18:11:30 UTC