- From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <tawmas@tawmas.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:19:09 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
Henri Sivonen wrote: >> serialization): >> >> 1. Requiring <!DOCTYPE html> >> >> 2. Allowing <!DOCTYPE html> >> >> 3. Requiring either <!DOCTYPE html> or <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "..."> > The question is what do will less harm (I'm talking only about HTML > > I'd be OK with spec text that makes a given PUBLIC id conforming, says > that it doesn't map to any DTD, says that it exists for compatibility > with tools that can't produce a doctype without a public id and says > that those who don't suffer from such tool limitations should not > bother to use it. > +1 to that
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:33:53 UTC