- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:27:01 +0300
- To: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Jul 30, 2007, at 03:32, Sander Tekelenburg wrote: > I can consume both the > text and the audio, but only deduce that they're equivalents by > consuming > both. There is zero indication that they are equivalents. The simplest possible way of addressing this issue without needing any changes to HTML and without any new browser UI would be adding a sentence immediately after the links to slides and the audio and briefly state what information they provide that isn't on the transcript page. (Or in the title attribute to make sure that the sentence gets associated with the link if the user uses an UA mode that only examines links and no surrounding text.) Does the relationship really need to be expressed in markup as opposed to natural-language text in the *immediate* vicinity of the link? Would an expression in markup capture (in a way the UA can reasonably expose--even in the usual visual CSS situation) the reason *why* the author thought it was worthwhile to provide non-text (to a degree sufficient for the user to make a decision on which version to get or to figure out what (s)he is missing)? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 09:27:26 UTC