- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:07:35 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
At 15:08 +1000 UTC, on 2007-07-28, Lachlan Hunt wrote: [...] > Does there really > need to be an explicit association between the video and the link to > it's textual alternative? Yes, otherwise there'd be no indication that it is an alternative. The only way for a user to find that out would then be to consume both resources and deduct that they were probably intended as equivalents. [...] > Look at any video on YouTube, for example. There is no explicit > association in the markup between the video and its metadata, such as > the user who uploaded it, the description, tags, number of times it has > been viewed or favourited, etc. None of those are equivalents of the video. They are complimentary. You're mixing up very different things. -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Saturday, 28 July 2007 06:11:46 UTC