- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:58:02 +0200
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
> > Ad hoc, I see that change as an advantage concerning general > > understanding of "uniqueness" as well as an improvement when it > > comes to consistency. On the other hand, it likely imposes more or > > less severe compatibility problems. > > Indeed: > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C%21DOCTYPE%20html%3E%0D%0A%3Cdiv%20id%3D%22foo%20bar%22%3ETEST%3C/div%3E%0D%0A%3Cscript%3E%20w%28document.getElementById%28%22foo%20bar%22%29.tagName%29%20%3C/script%3E Admittedly, there are suggestions of more value for HTML 5, right. However, I expected just a little more feedback concerning history and WG assessment. -- Jens Meiert http://meiert.com/en/ Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin.
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 15:58:15 UTC