- From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:26:38 -0500
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Oops. I used the wrong abbreviation. :-) substitute SSML for SMIL. ( I guess that belongs in the phonetic attribute :-). On Jul 20, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Robert Burns wrote: > Summary: > > * Propose some small editorial changes to the draft. > * Propose new element: <term> > * For use on mostly on <dfn>, but perhaps also on <abbr>, <term>, > and <var>, propose new attributes: scoped (boolean), defref > (string; required), casesensitive (boolean; referring to the defref > value), phonetic (or "pronunciation" string;), initiialism > (boolean; referring to the defref value), asword (boolean; > referring to the defref value) > > [...] > > [1]: Unicode currently provides little consistent data on the > phonetic properties of characters. Perhaps W3C could liaison with > Unicode over the issue of establishing semantic phonetic Unicode > characters. Alternatively we could provide a <phonetic> or > <pronunciation> element to contain SMIL markup. However, Unicode > could be enhanced to support plain-text phonetics with some minor > changes.
Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 05:26:49 UTC