I organized a section on our HTML Working Group Issues page to link to draft review wiki pages: <http://esw.w3.org/topic/ HTML#head-33630d836fecbf8d0484ed2928412573acd79a9b> You can copy the links that are already there to keep the hierarchical arrangement consistent when adding new pages. TRo help the editors as much as possible, I also think the thing to do is also try to link to the mail archive threads, other wiki pages (e.g., for Working Group Issues) with related issues (and anything else) as much as possible. Also, since there are multiple WG members reviewing each section or subsection, signing the various comments would help with follow-up on any issue. I think intermingling comments from different reviewers on the same topic would be helpful too as the editors review this material. The WG member reviewers might even try to work together to create a collaborative review. Just a few thoughts. Take care, RobReceived on Monday, 9 July 2007 09:42:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:55 GMT