W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax?

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:37:23 +0900
Message-Id: <18A05A7F-BDB1-4778-95E5-43269747F828@w3.org>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
To: Mynthon <mynthon1@gmail.com>


Le 6 juil. 2007 à 21:01, Mynthon a écrit :
> Difference between html and xml should be in parsing not in syntax.
> Forcing html-users to write xml compatible code will be very big step
> forward.

Would you be able to start a [wiki page on authoring HTML syntax][1].  
It seems that many Web authors have argued in favor of having  
stricter rules for writing HTML. It would be beneficial for this  
group to know what kind of syntax people would like to see and  
document how much benefit it gives to them.

It will not be necessary mandatory but could be a good guide for Web  
Pro authors as a platform for writing HTML.  It could become a kind  
of canonical syntax for Web design agencies. People could say:
	"It is HTML 5 but with the Web Pro syntactic guidelines."



[1]: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/AuthorSyntax



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 03:37:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:02 GMT