W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: handling fallback content for still images

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:41:41 +0300
Message-Id: <34282150-EF2B-417E-BBA5-3E05B50FA377@iki.fi>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
To: joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie

On Jul 6, 2007, at 13:17, Joshue O Connor wrote:

> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> <image> comes with a legacy parsing quirk attached to it. (As has  
>> already been pointed out many times.)
>
> Thanks Henri, it may have been pointed out many times but it is  
> still not clear,

I honestly don't know how to make it clearer. The de facto way the  
start tag <image> is handles is entrenched (and not open for debate  
considering our draft design principles). If you want an element for  
still images (or anything else) that doesn't behave exactly like  
<img> in the text/html serialization, the element names "img" and  
"image" are out of the consideration. There's an infinite number of  
potential names that don't carry this baggage, such as "picture" and  
"graphic".

> and with all due respect I have not got a clue what a 'legacy  
> parsing fork'  is but I guess I can't eat my dinner with it.

A legacy parsing *quirk* is a weird thing in parsing that browsers  
have to implement in order to work with legacy content out there. It  
follows that non-browser UAs need to implement them, too.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 10:41:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:46 UTC