W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: handling fallback content for still images

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:07:21 +0200
To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>, "Andrew Sidwell" <takkaria@gmail.com>
Cc: "James Graham" <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tuz4ijg964w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:49:51 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote:
> The irrationality isn't the arguments you listed. Its the merry-go-round  
> of essentially saying that the spec should forbid these practices,  
> followed by the no it shouldn't forbid it. In other words it should  
> forbid it and it should not forbid it.

What I meant with not forbidding is that there is an alternative for <img  
alt> that does allow markup fallback: <object>. I thought I made that  
clear. Sorry for the confusion.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 17:07:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:23 UTC