- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:38:23 -0500
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 7/5/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 11:55 -0500, Laura Carlson wrote: > > On 6/29/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > > First, a "No, disagree" response says > > > > > >> "Rationale based on design principles, for each and every > > >> dropped/added/changed element and attribute should be supplied." > > > > > > Well, perhaps it should. By all means, please do provide it. > > > > Okay, I've started justification pages* for them in the wiki and added > > links for them to the issues page [1]. The framework is now there. > > [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML > > Thanks for following up, but let's not make empty/template pages. > Would you please delete the ones with nothing novel in them? > I'll try to help. Isn't this framework a useful start for us to begin to justify the differences between HTML 4 and HTML 5? Thanks, Laura
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 16:38:29 UTC