W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...]

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:38:23 -0500
Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0707050938n2ed70c8m4216ec32d53de49a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>

On 7/5/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 11:55 -0500, Laura Carlson wrote:
> > On 6/29/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> > > First, a "No, disagree" response says
> > >
> > >> "Rationale based on design principles, for each and every
> > >> dropped/added/changed element and attribute should be supplied."
> > >
> > > Well, perhaps it should. By all means, please do provide it.
> >
> > Okay, I've started justification pages* for them in the wiki and added
> > links for them to the issues page [1]. The framework is now there.
> > [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML
>
> Thanks for following up, but let's not make empty/template pages.
> Would you please delete the ones with nothing novel in them?
> I'll try to help.

Isn't this framework a useful start for us to begin to justify the
differences between HTML 4 and HTML 5?

Thanks,
Laura
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 16:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:46 UTC