- From: Galen O'Hanlon <gohanlon@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 20:21:33 -0700
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: Ben 'Cerbera' Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "HTMLWG" <public-html@w3.org>
How about a daily digest of list activity? This workgroup has significantly more members than other workgroups and therefore more list activity. A daily digest is a common feature for groups of this size and for good reason. :-) Cheers, Galen O'Hanlon Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > > > Le 2 juil. 2007 à 18:53, Ben 'Cerbera' Millard a écrit : >> Karl Dubost wrote: >>> I'm willing to ask the system team, but first I need to clarify >>> the incentive to stay on the WG if not participating? >> >> I would still be participating. > > How? Most of the work done is made in an asynchronous way by the > mailing list? > It is interesting to understand how you conceive your active > participation to the group, so we could maybe define a better > architecture for this group with different kind of sub-groups. > > >> Karl Dubost wrote: >>> People are not forced to be on the HTML WG to follow the >>> discussions. >> >> Correct. But people need to be on HTMLWG to participate in surveys. > > Surveys are a decision tool. The goal of the WG is to do work on > things. See my question above. > > > > -- > Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ > W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead > QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ > *** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2007 19:01:51 UTC