Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4"

James Graham wrote:

> I have great difficulty believing that it is possible to reach that 
> level of agreement on _anything_ (HTML related or not) in a group this 
> size and that trying to do so might make the WG less relevant than it 
> would otherwise be.

That should read:
"I have great difficulty believing that it is possible to reach that
level of agreement on _anything_ (HTML related or not) in a group this
size and, furthermore, I believe that trying to do so will make the WG 
less relevant than it would otherwise be."

(this doesn't change the fact that I believe the issue of consensus is 
not relevant to the publishing of the differences document).

-- 
"Instructions to follow very carefully.
Go to Tesco's.  Go to the coffee aisle.  Look at the instant coffee. 
Notice that Kenco now comes in refil packs.  Admire the tray on the 
shelf.  It's exquiste corrugated boxiness. The way how it didn't get 
crushed on its long journey from the factory. Now pick up a refil bag. 
Admire the antioxidant claim.  Gaze in awe at the environmental claims 
written on the back of the refil bag.  Start stroking it gently, its my 
packaging precious, all mine....  Be thankful that Amy has only given 
you the highlights of the reasons why that bag is so brilliant."
-- ajs