W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: handling fallback content for still images

From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:18:38 -0500
Message-Id: <6A408706-B1D2-4234-A64E-DA515D8F6C0B@robburns.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
To: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>


On Jul 3, 2007, at 6:05 AM, Sander Tekelenburg wrote:

>
> [Assuming you mailed me off-list unintentionally]
>
> At 05:40 -0500 UTC, on 2007-07-03, Robert Burns wrote:
>
>> On Jul 3, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
>
> [....<http://santek.no-ip.org/~st/tests/picturetag/>]
>
>> One more thing. I noticed you put in that as a con, <object> is not
>> interoperable with IE. My thought was that I was including the object
>> markup that is interoperable with IE. I don't' have IE here to test
>> it, but if you or someone else could check I'd appreciate it.
>
> For me, IE6 renders no output whatsoever. I find the specs' object  
> and param
> definitions too incomprehensible, IE too unintresting and my time  
> too limited
> to debug -- sorry ;) If you for anyone else find something that  
> does work
> (better) with IE, I'll be happy to add it to this page though.

No that's fine. Thanks for trying. I'll get access to IE myself and  
see if I can come up with anything. Somewhere I read that adding the  
<param> as I did would get IE working. Maybe it's IE7 only. Or maybe  
its just plain wrong (I think I got if off of Wikipedia).

Take care,
Rob
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 11:18:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:02 GMT