W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: handling fallback content for still images

From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:59:30 -0500
Message-Id: <4E93C80C-27D3-461E-8B59-2E4BF4DAC0ED@robburns.com>
To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>

Hello all,

On Jul 3, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>>> I feel some relief that so many think we can deal with these  
>>>> <object> interoperability/implementation problems.
>>> I think IE is the main problem area so I'd like to hear from  
>>> Microsoft on this.
>> Me too. Though I'd also be interested in testing (or if someone  
>> else has done this already) what the various UAs do, when  
>> confronted with those simplified <object> cases (i.e., no <param>  
>> and not necessarily any declared type) for video, audio, image,  
>> and flash (probably no one supports type='image/canvas' since I  
>> made it up).
> Since you're interested in this topic, maybe you could start the  
> testing. If you fill in a wiki page with most of the results and  
> links to test cases, you could probably get others to fill in any  
> browsers you don't have access to.

Does anyone know how to use literal HTML when editing the wiki. I'm  
trying to use <object> and <img> and the like but it doesn't seem to  
work. Perhaps the Wiki isn't the place to do this since it's going to  
change my source text into arbitrary bad practice wikimedia style  

Also, I was wondering if there are some standard samples of various  
media that I can reference to create a test page. I'm trying to put  
together a test page for <object> and related elements and then  
source some video, audio, flash, and still image files.

I'd appreciate any assistance or suggestions anyone can offer.

Take care,
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 06:59:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:23 UTC