W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:55:54 +1000
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070702235554.GB31090@arc.mcc.id.au>

Dão Gottwald:
> They're all awful. XHTML 1.5 is the only alternative that I see (I was 
> just about to propose that until I that it was done before).
> 
> Besides, since XHTML2 has its own namespace, I don't think the XHTML2 WG
> is in the position to tell us to not call the XML serialisation of any
> HTML version "XHTML". FWIW, their language identifier is "XHTML2" to
> which they should consequentially append any version number, e.g.
> "XHTML2 1.0". As a reasult, "XHTML 5" (with a space!) is still on option
> for us.

While this thread is still around, I might point out this page, which
deals with TR version numbers:

  http://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions

-- 
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
	xmpp:heycam@jabber.org  ▪  ICQ 26955922  ▪  MSN cam@mcc.id.au
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 23:56:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:02 GMT