W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: DI element

From: Andrew Sidwell <takkaria@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:21:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4688D1AB.3060808@gmail.com>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> The suggestion made by someone that a singleton dt is "stupid" is
> incorrect. There are a number of cases where a term might be listed
> without a definition.

AFAICS, no-one's actually given any use cases for having <dt> without
<dd> on this thread so far, and I can't think of any offhand.  Care to
elaborate?

-- 
Andrew Sidwell
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 10:21:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:02 GMT