Re: DI element

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> The suggestion made by someone that a singleton dt is "stupid" is
> incorrect. There are a number of cases where a term might be listed
> without a definition.

AFAICS, no-one's actually given any use cases for having <dt> without
<dd> on this thread so far, and I can't think of any offhand.  Care to
elaborate?

-- 
Andrew Sidwell

Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 10:21:22 UTC