- From: aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 12:41:08 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
>> it's not at all, in your case, the visual rendering is the same but >> the semantic is different, in my case the visual rendering is the >> same and still have the same semantic (in the case of using di >> element or a for attribut mechanism) > I wasn't aware that you suddenly changed your original example to > include some non backwards compatible construct. My apologies. my example was just here to show that i can need a di or for mechanism in response of your demand after the original message : "- dt/dd need a reel relationship like the for attribut on label mechanism " The html 5semantic definition of the dl element is non backwards compatible with the current definition of dl element since the html 4 didn't say if the dt must be before or after the dd element (or i miss it)
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2007 10:41:19 UTC