- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:34:01 -0500
- To: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:44 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote: > On 30. mar. 2007, at 01.15, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Our scope is considerably smaller than that. > > I need some clarification on this. > > In what way is maintaining and producing "incremental revisions to > the HTML specification" considerable smaller in scope than proposing > changes in HTML? Some changes in HTML are in scope; some are not. Again, see the charter for details. http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#scope You wrote: | And I think that any proposed change in HTML and | corresponding browser support is withing the scope of this group. That says *all* changes are in scope, whether they be in HTML or any other technology that browsers support. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 18:34:14 UTC