> Having the list mailing software set Reply-To automatically is a very > contentious issue. Every time the issue pops up on my local LUG’s > mailing list the argument goes on for days. :) See for example: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html See for example: http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml > The (still) non-standard Mail-Followup-To header seems to be a better > way to solve the problem (assuming users on the list use mail clients > that support it): I didn't know that header yet. But from what I could find out from a little Googling, almost no client supports this.Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 13:39:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 30 March 2007 13:39:12 GMT