Le 30 mars 2007 à 15:20, Lachlan Hunt a écrit : >> 2006. Browser implements it in their UI > 2006. Realised it was a mistake to require duplication of data in > the head and body using both <link> and <a>. Defined how to link > to feeds using <a> [1|2] and began implementing [3]. hmmm I have a different reading of your links. They *never* requested duplication. It is not about duplication, but about adding the possibility to have a rel="feed" in the content. As long as the authors have the *choice* between a and link. It is fine by me. For example, I never put links to my RSS feeds in my content and do not want to do. I have plain control on my head ;) > [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#feed > [2] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#alternate > [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362864 -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 06:30:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 30 March 2007 06:30:50 GMT