On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:28 +0900, Laurens Holst wrote: > As on http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 I seems you would like me to > provide an example of an XHTML2 document that works in XHTML1: ´Hunt 20 > Mar 2007 <http://www.w3.org/mid/45FE99D1.4070906@lachy.id.au> takes > issue with a number of XHTML 2 features; a reply from Holst makes a > number of compatibility claims. It would be useful to see these > subtantiated by test cases.¡ > > Attached is a version of the XHTML2 document that is backing the > frontpage of www.backbase.com (home.xml). This document is a perfectly > valid XHTML2 document, as far as I can tell. Thanks for working out those details. Is this still about Simplifying Meta Data Profile? I think I have lost track of some of the context. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Thursday, 29 March 2007 22:12:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 March 2007 22:12:56 GMT