Re: XML input control

If not JavaScript then there is XUL. I think it's far more practical  
to force browser
vendors to implement scriptable GUI toolkits (like XUL) instead of  
creating a one-
size-fits-all WYSIWYG editor. Such a control would have to be extremely
configurable...

- ag


On 27.03.2007, at 06:58, Mike Schinkel wrote:

>
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>> That was more a hypothetical statement. A good WYSIWYG JS
>> editor is /possible/ just not implemented (yet).
>
> I would argue it is not implemented yet because it is difficult if not
> impossible to develop a good one in Javascript. An editor is too  
> complex to
> perform well when implemented with client scripting, and much deal  
> with
> different browsers.  It makes far more sense (to me) to see such
> functionality implemented in the browser; if nothing else it  
> eliminates
> browser incompatibility.
>
> -- 
> -Mike Schinkel
> http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/
> http://www.welldesignedurls.org
> http://atlanta-web.org - http://t.oolicio.us
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>