- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:11:33 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 20:22 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: [...] > > Therefore I think we should adopt David's guidelines as a design > principle, yes, "design principle" works fine, for me. > whether or not it is the kind of requirement you had in > mind. Is this worth a formal vote? Perhaps, but this looks like the sort of thing where consensus will emerge without formal decision-making. The question in my mind is whether we're going to start collecting requirements, design principles and such into a document, perhaps for publication on http://www.w3.org/TR/ . I'd be happy for a few volunteers to step forward by outlines... or does somebody want to start a wiki topic? Would you like it if I did that? something near http://esw.w3.org/topic/RequirementsDocument e.g. http://esw.w3.org/topic/CategoryHtmlDesignPrinciple with http://esw.w3.org/topic/DontBreakTheWeb in it, or /topic/dont_break_the_Web ... sometimes some bashing around the name is worthwhile. > Regards, > Maciej > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 03:11:43 UTC