W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January to March 2007

RE: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web

From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:29:56 -0400
To: <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <018201c76e7d$18e66c30$0702a8c0@Guides.local> 

> L. David Baron wrote:
> Proposed requirement:
>   New versions of HTML must not break 
>   significant numbers of Web pages.

I think I agree with the sentiment, but is is worded correctly?  IOW, how is
it possible a new spec can break existing *pages*?  Would this more
correctly be worded "New versions of HTML must not cause supporting clients
to break significant numbers of Web pages?"  Or something like that?
-- 
-Mike Schinkel
http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/
http://www.welldesignedurls.org
http://atlanta-web.org - http://t.oolicio.us
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:30:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:30:00 GMT