W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January to March 2007

Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?

From: Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:30:55 -0300
Message-ID: <4d90013f0703081030p488a0ceax88c91cf0b675352c@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org


I don't understand why the new version still refers to HTML, since it
is backwards incompatible. Is there any reason for this?

IMHO, a xhtml root element is more appropriate.

Greetings.

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:31:16 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?"
Previous message: Ian Hickson: "Re: [whatwg] call for participation: W3C HTML Working Group"
Next in thread: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?"
Reply: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:31:17 GMT