On Dec 29, 2007 10:39 PM, Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 29, 2007 1:19 PM, Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com> wrote: > > To me: bold, italics and underline are document constructs. They > > aren't rich in semantics. I agree with the point that it can't be > > determined what italics "means". But it might make sense to a human, > > Even a blind one ? Yes, on the assumption their UA/AT is able to inform them when bold, italics and underline are used (in the same way "link" is announced... I know you didn't think the fact links were blue and underlined was important to blind people.) It won't be able to announce *why* the phrase is underlined, they will need to draw their own conclusions - the same as sighted users.Received on Sunday, 30 December 2007 03:36:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:24 GMT