Just for the record. Le 25 déc. 2007 à 06:44, Preston L. Bannister a écrit : > Things are a little non-obvious. I suspect this has mostly to do > with trying to invent a new process (for W3C) on the fly - nothing > inherently bad. The W3C Process document has *always* evolved with the need of communities. It gives a reasonable stability and at the same time, it is being adjusted when needed. The HTML WG is *right now* operating under the requirements of W3C Process Document. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be CoolReceived on Tuesday, 25 December 2007 01:23:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 September 2008 22:52:12 GMT