W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2007

W3C Process Document Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 10:23:13 +0900
Cc: "Dean Edridge" <dean@55.co.nz>, public-html@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C44E63E9-BDA8-43D6-A74A-FA123ABCECAC@w3.org>
To: Preston L.Bannister <preston@bannister.us>

Just for the record.

Le 25 déc. 2007 à 06:44, Preston L. Bannister a écrit :
> Things are a little non-obvious.  I suspect this has mostly to do  
> with trying to invent a new process (for W3C) on the fly - nothing  
> inherently bad.

The W3C Process document has *always* evolved with the need of  
communities. It gives a reasonable stability and at the same time, it  
is being  adjusted when needed. The HTML WG is *right now* operating  
under the requirements of W3C Process Document.

Karl Dubost - W3C
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Tuesday, 25 December 2007 01:23:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:29 UTC