Gavin Pearce wrote: > Wasn't suggesting we replace anything, just run things side by side. > If the WG archive was better designed, it could archive and > sort topics in a tree structure. With finished spec at the > bottom, first discussions at the top, changes & mods made, by > who and what date. (perhaps with user input, perhaps without). > > Not planning on getting us to remove the mailing list > altogether, just to make it to view. > > I couldn't, for example, even with a fancy email client, tell > you who was writing the spec for what tag without reading > through about 20-30 emails on the subject, hoping to find the > one where someone said "I'll do it". > > If it was more of a tree structure, so say the > work-in-progress spec at the top, modifications made, by who, > and when, who's currently in charge of that spec and who's > working on it, and below all that you could list the email > structure, so all emails from start to end in an archive format. +1 -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.org - http://t.oolicio.usReceived on Monday, 26 March 2007 15:36:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 March 2007 15:36:51 GMT