W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5

From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <tawmas@tawmas.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:19:09 +0200
Message-ID: <460676CD.8050008@tawmas.net>
To: public-html@w3.org

Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> serialization):
>>
>> 1. Requiring <!DOCTYPE html>
>>
>> 2. Allowing <!DOCTYPE html>
>>
>> 3. Requiring either <!DOCTYPE html> or <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "...">
> The question is what do will less harm (I'm talking only about HTML
>
> I'd be OK with spec text that makes a given PUBLIC id conforming, says 
> that it doesn't map to any DTD, says that it exists for compatibility 
> with tools that can't produce a doctype without a public id and says 
> that those who don't suffer from such tool limitations should not 
> bother to use it.
>
+1 to that
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:33:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:34:34 GMT