On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:46:11 +0100, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > I think this working group was created to give a W3C future to the > spirit and specs of the WHAT-WG, so I think a good but rather orthodox > way to start could be > > 1. ask the WHATWG to freeze a version of its specs for let's say > 15 days. I know that's hard, but we really need it. > 2. have this WG's members review the documents during this period > 3. continue on these specs as usual, this should allow to make the > specs "ours" rapidly I think this sounds like a good way forward, although I'm not sure 15 days is enough. That depends on when we start counting, though, because this WG isn't fully assembled yet as far as I understand, and we can't really freeze the WHAT WG specifications and start counting until it is. > On another note, I hope we'll have more than browser vendors here. > Adobe/Macromedia ? IBM ? AOL ? Indeed. Google? Yahoo? Sun? -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjorn@ulsberg.no «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 14:00:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 14 March 2007 14:00:48 GMT