W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?

From: Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:30:48 -0300
Message-ID: <4d90013f0703081430s411441acuc0fe39afe9a359cb@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org
On 3/8/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:30:55 +0100, Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't understand why the new version still refers to HTML, since it
> > is backwards incompatible. Is there any reason for this?
> >
> > IMHO, a xhtml root element is more appropriate.
>
> This is not the appropriate list for XHTML2. I think you want
> www-html-editor@w3.org. (Although given all the new WGs that might have
> shifted as well.)
>
>
> This group will work on a backwards compatible version of HTML (including
> its XML serialization, called XHTML).
>
>
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
>

Thank you, and sorry the noise.
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 22:31:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 March 2007 22:31:03 GMT